PARADIGMA METODOLOGI OBJEKTIF DAN SUBJEKTIF ANTARA EPISTEMOLOGI METODOLOGIS ILMU TERAPAN DAN ILMU AL-QUR’AN DAN TAFSIR DALAM URGENSI INTEGRASI KEILMUAN PADA ERA POST-MODERNISME

Unggul Purnomo Aji

Abstract


This research is motivated by the complexity of post-modern problems that demand the integration of scientific disciplines and the methodological distinction between Qur’anic and Tafsir Studies and Applied Sciences. The aim of this study is to identify the appropriate reasoning epistemology within the field of Qur’anic and Tafsir Studies in light of the urgency of cross-disciplinary integration, and to explore the segregation and dichotomy of methodological paradigms with Applied Sciences. This research employs a library study based on non-field data relevance. The results show that, in general, the methodological foundations between the absolutist-subjective nature of Qur’anic and Tafsir Studies and the relativist-empirical nature of Applied Sciences are different. Nevertheless, the space for synthesis in dialectically reconciling empirical scientific truths with absolute divine truths remains open. This, of course, requires burhÄnÄ« reasoning that can be tested through coherence, correspondence, and pragmatism

Keywords


Qur’anic and Tafsir Studies; Applied Sciences; Methodology; Integration of; Knowledge; Post-Modernism

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdullah, Muhammad Amin, Islamic Studies di Perguruan Tinggi: Pendekatan Integrasi-Interkoneksi, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2006.

Abdurrahman Wahid, Pribumisasi Islam dalam Islam Indonesia Menatap Masa Depan, Jakarta: P3M, 1989.

Aji, Unggul Purnomo, Diskursus Paradigma Makroekonomi Inklusif daman Perspektif Al-Qur’an: Tunjauan Tafsir Kontekstual Pada Ayat-Ayat Mata Uang dalam Paradigma Ekonomi Ortodoks dan Heterodoks, dalam Jurnal Al-Burhan: Kajian Ilmu dan Pengembangan Al-Qur’an, Vol. 23 No. 1 Tahun 2025, hal. 1-30.

Alan Chalmers, What Is This Thing Called Science?, London: Hackett Publishing, 2013.

Al-Attas, S. M. Naquib, The Concept of Knowledge in Islam, Kuala Lumpur: ISTAC, 1990.

Al-Jabiri, Muhammad Abid, Bunyah al-Aql al-Arabi: Dirasah Tahliliyah Naqdiyah li al-Nuzum al-Ma’rifah fi al-Saqofah al-Arabiyah, Beirut: Markaz Dirasah al-Wahdah al-Arabiya, 1990.

Al-Jabiri, Muhammad Abid, Ishkaliyat al-Fikr al-Arabi al-Mu’asir, Beirut: Markaz Dirasat al-Wahdah al-Arabiyah, 2010.

Al-Jabiri, Muhammad Abid, Takwin al-Aql al-Arabi, Beirut: Markaz Dirasat al-Wahdah al-Arabiyah, 2009.

Andini, Riddo, “Konservasi Lingkungan Berbasis Ekologi Integral Perspektif Al-Qur’an,†dalam Tesis, Jakarta: Institut PTIQ Jakarta, 2022. https://repository.ptiq.ac.id/id/eprint/683/ diakses 18 April 2025.

Arthur Asa Berger, Media and Communication Research Method: An Introduction to Qualitative and Quantitative Approach, London: Sage Publication, 2000.

Baba et al., "A Qur’anic Methodology for Integrating Knowledge and Education: Implications for Malaysia’s Islamic Education Strategy,†dalam Jurnal The American Journal of Islamic Social Sciences, Vol. 32 No. 2 Tahun 2015, hal. 1-27.

Copi & Cohen, Introduction to Logic, New York: Routledge, 2000.

Cresswell, Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Chosing Among Five Tradition, London: Sage Publication, 2002.

Creswell, Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, London: Sage, 2014.

Darabi et al., "Relativism and Absolutism in the Hermeneutic Paradigm of Contemporary Quranic Studies,†dalam Jurnal Islamic Studies and Culture, Vol. 8 No. 3 Tahun 2024, hal. 24-67.

Denzin & Lincoln, The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research, London: Sage, 2011.

Denzin, Norman K., The Research Act: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1989.

Djafar, Hilman et al., "Qualitative And Quantitative Paradigm Constellation in Educational Research Methodology," dalam Jurnal International Journal of Educational Research & Social Sciences, Vol. 2 No. 2 Tahun 2021, hal. 339-345.

Emerson et al., Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2011.

Flick, Uwe, An Introduction to Qualitative Research, London: Sage Publications, 2014.

Fowler, The Fusion of Elements in Stars, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.

Graeme, “Vague and Artificial: The Historically Elusive Distinction Between Pure And Applied Science,†dalam Jurnal Isis, Vol. 103 No. 3 Tahun 2012, hal. 546-554.

Haidar Baqir, “Jejak-Jejak Sains Islam Dalam Sains Modern,†dalam Jurnal Al-Qur’an, Jakarta: edisi Juli-September Tahun 1989, hal. 34.

Hale & Wright, A Companion to the Phylosophof Language, Oxford: Blackwell Publisher, 1999.

Hamid, Abdul, Qur’an dan Metodologi Tafsir, Jakarta: Lentera Hati, 2020.

Hamidah, “Pemikiran Neo-Modernisme Nurcholish Madjid dan K.H Abdurrahman Wahid: Memahami Perkembangan Pemikiran Intelektual Islam,†dalam Jurnal MIQOT, Vol. 37 No. 1 Tahun 2011, hal. 79-80.

Hamidah, “Pemikiran Neo-Modernisme Nurcholish Madjid dan K.H Abdurrahman Wahid: Memahami Perkembangan Pemikiran Intelektual Islam,†dalam Jurnal MIQOT, Vol. 37 No. 1 Tahun 2011, hal. 79-80.

Hasan et al., "Application of Burhani Epistemology to Science Verses: Applied Studies in the Book of Science Verses," dalam Jurnal Al-Afkar: Journal For Islamic Studies, Vol. 7 No. 2 Tahun 2024, hal. 262-276.

Hasanudin et al., "Hakikat Tafsir Menurut Para Mufassir," dalam Jurnal Iman Dan Spiritualitas, Vol. 2 No. 2 Tahun 2022, hal. 203-210.

Hidayat, “Metodologi Penelitian dalam Multi-Paradigm Science,†dalam Jurnal Komunikasi MediaTor, Vol. 3 No. 2 Tahun 2002, hal. 20-42.

https://luk.staff.ugm.ac.id/atur/Permendikbud154-2014RIPTG-Lampiran.pdf diakses 18 April 2025

Kamel Khaldi, "Quantitative, Qualitative or Mixed Research: Which Research Paradigm to Use,†dalam Jurnal of Educational and Social Research, Vol. 7 No. 2 Tahun 2017, hal. 15-24.

Khorsan & Crawford, "External Validity and Model Validity: A Conceptual Approach for Systematic Review Methodology,†dalam Jurnal Evidenceâ€Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, Vol. 1 Tahun 2014, hal. 694-804.

Mahmudah, "Al-Qur’an Sebagai Sumber Tafsir dalam Pemikiran Muhammad Syahrûr," dalam Jurnal Hermeneutik, Vol. 8 No. 2 Tahun 2014, hal. 275.

Marshal & Rossman, Designing Qualitative Research, London: Sage Publisher, 1995.

Mengali et al., "Relative Motion of Sun-Pointing Smart Dust in Circular Heliocentric Orbits," dalam Jurnal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 41 No. 4 Tahun 2018, hal. 1015-1020.

Miles et al., Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook, London: Sage, 2014.

Morrison, Margaret, "Applying Science And Applied Science: What’s The Difference?," dalam Jurnal International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 20 No. 1 Tahun 2006, hal. 81-91.

Muhammadun, “Kritik Nalar al-Jabiri; Bayani, Irfani dan Burhani dalam Membangun Islamic Studies Integrasi-Interkoneksi,†dalam Jurnal Islamic Education Journal, Vol. 1 No. 2 Tahun 2019, hal. 133-164.

Mustaqim, Abdul, Pergeseran Epistemologi Tafsir, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2008.

Nils, Roll-Hansen, "A Historical Perspective On The Distinction Between Basic And Applied Science," dalam Jurnal for General Philosophy of Science, Vol. 48 No. 4 Tahun 2017, hal. 535-551.

Nukhba, "A Comprehensive Review of Comparative Interpretation of Holy Quran: Approaches, Methodologies, and Criteria for Establishing Plausible Interpretations," dalam Jurnal International Journal Of Humanities Education and Social Sciences,Vol. 3 No. 2 Tahun 2023, hal. 719-730

Patton, Qualitative Research and Evaluation Method, London: Sage Publication, 2002.

Paul Hoyningen, Systematicity: The Nature of Science, Oxford University Press, 2013.

Polit et al., "Generalization in Quantitative and Qualitative Research: Myths and Strategies,†dalam Jurnal International Journal of Nursing Studies, Vol. 47 No. 11 Tahun 2010, hal. 1451-1458.

Reagan, "Basic and Applied Research: A Meaningful Distinction?,†dalam Jurnal Science, Vol. 155 No.37 Tahun 1967, hal. 1383-1386.

Ricoeur, Paul, The Conflict of Interpretations: Essays in Hermeneutics, Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1974.

Ridlo, "Tafsir Komprehensif Karya Clifford Geertz: Abangan, Santri, Dan Priyayi dalam Masyarakat Jawa," dalam Jurnal Humanistika: Jurnal Keislaman, Vol. 7 No. 2 Tahun 2021, hal. 220-241.

Rizki M Fahmi, Pemikiran Fazlur Rahman tentang Pendidikan Islam Neo-Modernis, Surakarta: Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta, 2018.

Robert & Gronlund, Measurement and Assessment in Teaching, New York: Merrill Prentice Hall, 2000.

Saeed, Abdullah, Interpreting the Qur’an: Towards a Contemporary Approach, London: Routledge, 2006.

Scott et al., "The Soliton: a New Concept in Applied Science," dalam Proceedings of the IEEE, Vol. 61 No. 10 Tahun 1973, hal. 1443-1483.

Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D, Bandung: Alfabeta, 2015.

Sutikno, “Islam di antara Modernisme dan Post-Modernisme,†dalam Jurnal Studi Agama-Agama, Vol 3 No. 1 Tahun 2013, hal. 107-129.

Thomas Djamaluddin, “Ilmu Falak dan Relevansinya dalam Penentuan Waktu Ibadah,†dalam Jurnal Sains dan Teknologi Antariksa, Vol. 2, No. 1 Tahun 2010, hal.. 15–20.

Tipler & Mosca, Physics for Scientists and Engineers, New York: W.H. Freeman, 1998.

Ummah, Sun Choirol, “Metode Tafsir Kontemporer Abdullah Saeed,†dalam Jurnal Humanika, Vol. 18 No. 2 Tahun 2018, hal. 126-142.

Yaqin & Shofwan, "Kajian Keilmuan Islam Holistik-Integratif Mengakhiri Dikotomi Ilmu Agama dan Umum," dalam Jurnal SINDA: Comprehensive Journal of Islamic Social Studies, Vol. 3 No. 1 Tahun 2023, hal. 100-108.

Yuyun Rohmawati, “Islam dan Neo-Modernisme/Post-Modernisme Perspektif Nurcholis Madjid dan Abdurrahman Wahid,†dalam Jurnal Ilmu Ushuluddin, Vol 20 No.1 Tahun 2021, hal. 60-71.

Yuyun Rohmawati, “Islam dan Neo-Modernisme/Post-Modernisme: Perspektif Nurcholis Madjid dan Abdurrahman Wahid,†dalam Jurnal Ilmu Ushuluddin, Vol 20 No. 1 Tahun 2021, hal. 60-71.

Zulaiha, "Penyatuan Istilah dalam Studi Ilmu Tafsir: Eksplorasi Keragaman Istilah Metodologi dalam Tafsir," dalam Jurnal AL QUDS: Jurnal Studi Alquran dan Hadis, Vol. 7 No. 3 Tahun 2023, hal. 449-462.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.36671/mumtaz.v9i1.1022

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Unggul Purnomo Aji

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.